Last week the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania made a surprising ruling: a company can show that random alcohol test are “job related and consistent with business necessity.” In the first case of its kind, the federal judge rejected the EEOC’s Enforcement Guidelines. Before this ruling, the traditional wisdom, garnered from the guidelines was:
-
You can test a person for alcohol only if you have reasonable cause or suspicion,
» Read more about: Court Finds that Random Alcohol Tests Don’t Always Violate the ADA »